Retired Army Lt. Gen.
William G. Boykin, the former head of the U.S. Special Forces Command, says
infantry and other front-line units are no place for women, and it has nothing
to do with their courage or capabilities: I agree with LT. GEN. Boykin –men & woman have the ability to serve
side by side in service, be it law enforcement or the military in a moderate
number of situations.
How other
countries run and train their military should in no way determine how the U.S.
runs its military. Leaders of the world's most powerful and
effective fighting force, the U.S. military, don't need to listen to media
activists recommending that we become a larger version of the Canadian
military. I believe the reality of this decision is a
sign that our troops are not getting enough qualified enlistments, are fed up
with multiple rotations, are currently dealing with increased effects of fellow
soldier suicides, have increased pressures of family break ups, have increased
financial pressures to include higher than normal bankruptcy rates, and the
list goes on ad infinitum. US MARINES BOOT CAMP and the Special Forces boot
camp are different in a multitude of ways from standard initial training for
all the services with regards to recruits. All of this posturing and all of the
opinions are sadly being made in what amounts to a peace time planning
situation.
"The people
making this decision are doing so as part of another social experiment, and
they have never lived nor fought with an infantry or Special Forces unit,"
Boykin said in a statement released by the conservative Family Research
Council, for whom he now works. "These units have the mission of closing
with and destroying the enemy, sometimes in close hand-to-hand combat. They are
often in sustained operations for extended periods, during which they have no
base of operations or facilities. Their living conditions are primal in many situations
with no privacy for personal hygiene or normal functions." Integrating the
genders in direct-combat situations "places additional and unnecessary
burdens on leaders at all levels," Boykin said. "While their focus
must remain on winning the battles and protecting their troops, they will now
have the distraction of having to provide some separation of the genders during
fast moving and deadly situations.
When
we introduce sex into the equation everything changes – now we finally come to the crux of the main problem - human
nature. A certain amount of sexual tension exists in an office environment,
especially one filled with young adults of both sexes. However, workers are
only together eight hours a day, five days a week, and most of the time;
they're working alone, on their own tasks. Even in this environment, two
lovers, especially if they aren't getting along, or if one of them is a
manager, can be distracting, create problems for upper management, and reduce
the productivity or effectiveness of an office. Multiply the sexual tension
several-fold for a war overseas, where young soldiers are away from loved ones
for long periods of time, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, working or even
sleeping together as a team in a much more stressful environment.
It's not necessary for the physical & logistical makeup of the U.S.
military to be representative of the population
and a military career is not a
"right, actually far from it. The military must hire and train with the
understanding that the next war may have to be fought much differently than the
last war - World War II was a different type of war from the Vietnam War
(long guerrilla war), which was different from the first Gulf War, just for
example. At some point in the future, we may face another war similar in logistics
& scope to World War II. Many rules and standards that seem to work in
relatively short wars, where the U.S. faces a much weaker foe militarily, may
cause problems in a different type of war.
Similarly, policies that can be made to work in a peacetime or a
training environment may not work very well at all on the battlefield - Liberal journalists applaud mixed
male-female units, but in a long-term, evenly fought, intense war, will the
time, manpower, and money needed to enforce policies regarding sex, sexual
harassment, and discrimination against women and mixed male-female units help
or hurt a d erode our effectiveness?
Now to include women will force the SOP
and command structure to address a myriad of factors not the least of which -
the entire structure has NO PRIVACY what-so-ever, NO modified PT TRAINING, NO
SEPARATE SHOWERS, sleeping on board ships, sleeping-eating-living in open air
foxholes. In other words NO PRIVACY of any kind to speak of. Morale and
unit cohesion are pooh-poohed by the left, but have historically been a very
important element in military success or failure
- In athletics, professional coaches understand this, and those with a basic
understanding of human nature and a general knowledge of military history
should also understand the importance of morale and unit cohesion. To modify a female’s physical nature to
endure US MARINE BOOK CAMP or Special Forces would deform the female entirely,
over extend muscle build up, require haircuts, NO MAKE UP of any kind. They
would be required to run distances with the same time frame and distance as
males without exception, the O courses, MEDICAL CARE in LINE UNITS do NOT have
anything even close to OBGYN, CORPSMAN not trained to deal with a plethora of
female issues. Have you ever crossed a swamp with green slime on the surface and
then get out, buddy up and check for leeches? How is that going to work? They
can enter and be in parts you can’t think of. When deployed in theatre areas
‘monthly’ can NEVER BE USED as someone else has to carry the share. Women can
die more quickly to being in swamp waters with a virus a lot easier than men,
and for the most part men do not worry about those issues. A TRAINING PACK and
rear echelon pack is much lighter than a GRUNT PACK, then you add to that the
joy of a vest 'flak jacket that rubs
nipples raw, in some cases to the point of bleeding, staying in a fighting
position or bunker for days without coming out, they share the pot and again NO
PRIVACY, in a tank, the crew may not get out and use the side of the road or a
bush for days, so the ammo can pot has to suffice, no privacy again. GRUNTS just
do not have that luxury. Your budge rips
off the clothing to get at the wound to treat the issue, silk would be
dangerous because it melts under heat, hence why you go with cotton briefs. Sometimes
grunts come across a stream and post guards in combat so troops can rinse off
as it may have been weeks since a real bath, and yet again NO privacy.
Physical strength
still matters - Some political
elites and media commentators have noted that a lot of military equipment can
be operated by pushing buttons and that strength tests and the lowering of
physical standards for women are irrelevant & unimportant. The problem is
that in a war, especially a longer, more intense war, like World War II,
soldiers may have to perform tasks that they were not originally trained to do.
Versatility is a desirable characteristic in a soldier. Strength can also
affect speed and endurance, which are crucial on the battlefield. "If a
soldier is wounded in battle...a collocated support soldier may be the only
person in a position to evacuate the wounded soldier on his own back. In this
environment, women do not have an equal opportunity to survive, or to help
fellow soldiers survive. Lives should not be put at needless risk just to
satisfy 'diversity metrics' for the career ambitions of a few."
Could a woman grab a man and slice his
throat? China troops have over 200 hours in hand to hand combat techniques. US
MARINES earn rankings or are not promoted – period. Pugal sticks, knife
fighting - yes NO HOLDS BARRED. I could envision it now in Boot camp, and that
would be the easy part. There could be no expectation that any slack is given
because to offer that slack is to endanger the other marines, other troops,
other team members. The average BOOT MARINE PLATOON or SF qualifiers are formed
with about 60 to 70 boots. The graduation numbers vacillate quite a bit, most
of the time even with men in decent shape; over half are discharged or dropped
from the program. The talking bobble heads in the news media clearly have absolutely
no idea.
Admittedly, this is
less of a problem for peacetime troops, or in recent wars where we've had an
overwhelming battlefield advantage and the engagement is considered short-term,
but we don't know what the future will bring - a protracted, more evenly
matched, deadlier WWII type war will bring this problem to the forefront.
The intense male bonding of a "non-sexual" nature was crucial to unit
cohesion, morale and effectiveness in many past wars. Regarding sex,
what's going to happen if a leader appears to show preferential treatment to
his lover? Critics will counter this is against SOP and policy therefore it
should never happen – but we all know how that works out don’t we? What
if he has to pick a few soldiers for a dangerous mission - will his lover be
included? What happens to morale and cohesion if some soldiers are
receiving sex on a regular basis and some are not? This issue alone could
affect a myriad of situations that we have never had to solve to this point. What
if some soldiers are extremely jealous or show stalking tendencies? What
happens if a soldier is willing to literally fight for his/her love interest?
Is this going to amount to what some claim will be just a distraction or in
fact will it be a cascade of problems that snow ball into an avalanche?
I am sure, and confident, that ANY
FEMALE can try to take the tests and post the PT, time, & numbers. MEN
TRAIN FOR WAR. It’s not fun – it’s brutal, no holds barred, and NO RULES BUT
FIGHT TO WIN period, even if they had to bite the nuts off the man trying to
kill them. IT has absolutely no similarities to anything in the movies like it or
NOT. KBAR in the GUTS and drag the KNIFE SIDE TO SIDE GUTTING the person, all
the while accepting that both will be cut in knife fighting, it goes both ways.
In another view as the man your fighting is begging for his life for you to
back off, pausing for a split second turns the tables and he guts YOU. GRUNTS
FIGHT TO WIN, to SURVIVE. IN USMC or Special Forces you EARN your right to be there, and what you do, NO ONE offers
you an EASY WAY, or a free ride, YOU EARN IT, work to keep it, and understand
that LIVES OF OTHERS ARE ON THE LINE and depend on your follow through. If you
cannot give an order to a man, or woman in this case knowing full well they may
very well get killed or die in the
process – this is NOT THE PLACE to begin to practice. IT HAPPENS, PEOPLE DIE, it’s
not politically correct and it’s worse than the words written here. Accept that
and understand it but PC will not keep you or the person next to you alive.